Astounding Science-Fiction v30n01, September 1942



ISFDB link
Archive.org link

Other reviews:
Jamie Rubin, Vacation in the Golden Age

_____________________

Editor, John W. Campbell Jr., Assistant Editor, Catherine Tarrant

Fiction:
The Barrier • novella by Anthony Boucher ∗∗∗
The Twonky • novelette by Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore [as by Lewis Padgett]
Nerves • novella by Lester del Rey
Pride • short story by Malcolm Jameson
Starvation • short story by Fredric Brown
With Flaming Swords • novella by Cleve Cartmill +

Non-fiction:
Cover • by William Timmins
Interior artwork • by Kolliker (x3), Willy Ley (x4), Paul Orban (x7), Charles Schneeman, Frank Kramer (x4)
Weapons and War • editorial by John W. Campbell, Jr.
Death Under the Sea • essay by Willy Ley
The Analytical Laboratory: July 1942
In Times to Come
Brass Tacks
• letters

_____________________

This issue of Astounding contains two of this year’s Retro-Hugo nominees, The Twonky by “Lewis Padgett”, and Nerves by Lester del Rey, hence this review (more or less—I’ve also read Boucher’s story for something else I’m reading, the retrospective ‘Best of the Year’ anthology for 1942, The Great SF Stories #4, edited by Martin H. Greenberg and Isaac Asimov).1
Before I get to the fiction I’d like to mention the cover artist, William Timmins, who appears for the first time (with a scene from Boucher’s story) as a result of Hubert Rogers joining the war effort. Timmins would reappear in the December 1942 issue, and would then provide every cover of Astounding until January 1947, except the July 1944 (Fred Haucke) and December 1946 (Alejandro) issues—a run of 48 covers out of 50 (and he would reappear a handful of times over the next few years). Much of Timmins’ work is unexceptional but he nevertheless produced some of Astounding’s best covers.2

The fiction leads off with Anthony Boucher’s debut in Astounding (although he’d previously appeared in Unknown), The Barrier, an ambitious time travel story that makes much of future linguistic drift:

The first difficulty was with language.
That is only to be expected when you jump five hundred years; but it is nonetheless perplexing to have your first casual query of: “What city is this?” answered by the sentence: “Stappers will get you. Or be you Slanduch?”
It was significant that the first word John Brent heard in the State was “Stappers.” But Brent could not know that then. It was only some hours later and fifty years earlier that he learned the details of the Stapper system. At the moment all that concerned him was food and plausibility.
[. . .]
He pondered the alternatives presented by the stranger. The Stappers would get him, unless he was a Slanduch. Whatever the Stappers were, things that Get You sound menacing. “Slanduch,” he replied.
The stranger nodded. “That bees O. K.,” he said, and Brent wondered what he had committed himself to. “So what city is this?” he repeated.
Bees,” the stranger chided. “Stappers be more severe now since Edict of 2470. Before they doed pardon some irregularities, but now none even from Slanduch.”
“I be sorry,” said Brent humbly, making a mental note that irregular verbs were for some reason perilous.  p. 9-10

Almost immediately after this exchange three Stappers appear through a wall and challenge Brent’s interlocutor for “speaking against Barrier”. The man shows them his identity bracelet. When they stun him, Brent does not waste any time in making his escape up onto a balcony.
He then hides in a nearby room, and an older woman arrives who perplexingly recognises him, as does her brother Stephen who joins them later. When he arrives there is a data dump explaining how this static, and therefore anti-time travel, society came into being. This is not entirely convincing. There is also discussion about the “Barrier”, which is supposed to prevent time travel. As Brent has somehow managed to penetrate it they go to see his time machine. The Stappers (a corruption of “Gestapo”) find them; Brent and Martha escape in the machine, and go fifty years into the past.
The rest of the story involves a small group of people (including younger versions of Martha and Stephen) repairing his time machine and plotting to return to prevent the activation of a second Barrier (the reason they only go fifty years into the past is that Brent’s machine destroys the first one—how he got through it on the first occasion without this happening is, if I recall correctly, wobbily explained).
When they arrive back in the future they infiltrate the Barrier activation ceremony only to see the machine generating it explode, an event caused by an attack of future time travellers. These are quickly subdued by the Stappers and arrested.

Most writers would probably wrap up the story here by sending Brent away on his time machine—Boucher, however, is only about two-thirds of the way through and in the rest of it he tries to outdo van Vogt.
Brent becomes a government interpreter, and interrogates three of the time traveller prisoners (Kruj speaks in an Elizabethan English variant, Mimi the Amazonian in a future-slang type speech, and the Venusian Nikobat in a language that is a meld of all Earth ones) :

Brent picked Tiny Beard as the easiest-looking start. “O. K. You!” He pointed, and the man stepped forward. “What part of time do you come from?”
“A pox o’ thee, sirrah, and the goodyears take thee! An thou wouldst but hearken to me, thou might’st learn all.”
The State linguist moaned. “You hear, young man? How can one interpret such jargon?”
Brent smiled. “It bees O. K. This bees simply English as it beed speaked thousand years ago. This man must have beed aiming at earlier time and prepared himself. . . . Thy pardon, sir. These kerns deem all speech barbaric save that which their own conceit hath evolved. Bear with me, and all will be well.”
“Spoken like a true knight!” the traveler exclaimed. “Forgive my rash words, sir. Surely my good daemon hath led thee hither. Thou wouldst know—”
“Whence comest thou?”
“From many years hence. Thousands upon thousands of summers have yet to run their course ere I—”
“Forgive me, sir; but of that much we are aware. Let us be precise.”
“When then, marry, sir, ’tis from the fifth century.”  p. 23-24

Brent beckoned forward the woman. She strode forth so vigorously that both Stappers bared their rods.
“Madam,” Brent ventured tentatively, “what part of time do you come from?”
“Evybuy taws so fuy,” she growled. “Bu I unnasta. Wy cachoo unnasta me?”
Brent laughed. “Is that all that’s the trouble? You don’t mind if I go on talking like this, do you?”
“Naw. You taw howeh you wanna, slonsoo donna like I dih taw stray.”
Fascinating, Brent thought. All final consonants lost, and many others. Vowels corrupted along lines indicated in twentieth-century colloquial speech. Consonants sometimes restored in liaison as in French.  p. 24

He beckoned to the green-skinned biped, who advanced with a curious lurching motion like a deep-sea diver.
“And you, sir. When do you come from?”
“Ya studier langue earthly. Vyerit todo langue isos. Ou comprendo wie govorit people.”
Brent was on the ropes and groggy. The familiarity of some of the words made the entire speech even more incomprehensible. “Says which?” he gasped.
The green man exploded. “Ou existier nada but dolts, cochons, duraki v this terre? Nikovo parla langue earthly? Potztausend Sapperment en la leche de tu madre and I do mean you!”
Brent reeled. But even reeling he saw the disapproving frown of the State linguist and the itching fingers of the Stappers. He faced the green man calmly and said with utmost courtesy, “‘Twas brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble over the rivering waters of the hitherandthithering waters of pigeons on the grass alas. Thank you, sir.” He turned to the linguist. “He says he won’t talk.”  p. 24

Added to the mix is a Stapper called Boko, who proves he can time-travel by mind control when he closes his eyes for a second and a copy of him appears at the door. Later, a bodiless time-traveller reveals herself (she is initially resident in Martha’s brain but jumps around).
The climatic insurrection scene (spoiler) has Martha’s brother Stephen possessed by this bodiless time traveller, who convinces him to kill himself to end the war. He does so, and all the future time travellers disappear—there is a third Barrier.
This ambitious and novel piece has some interesting ideas but it goes on for too long, and some parts of it are either a bit of a mess or are not entirely convincing.

The Twonky by Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore also starts with a time traveller, this one with amnesia, unintentionally arriving in a radio-phonograph3 factory. His job in the future is building ‘Twonkies’ so he uses the material at hand to build one, and then has a nap. His amnesia clears shortly after he wakes up, and he disappears on his time machine, leaving behind the modified phonogram/Twonky behind.
The phonogram is bought by a university lecturer and his wife and, after the latter leaves to visit her sister, things start to get weird: the phonograph starts acting like a robot, lighting the man’s cigarettes, doing the dishes, etc. However, (spoiler) matters take an ominous turn when it stops him reading certain books, listening to certain music, and generally prevents him from doing things it does not approve of.
The couple eventually try to destroy it but come off worse.
Despite its ‘classic’ status4 I found this, at best, an okay gimmick story, and thought it read like a rehearsal for the superior Mimsy Were the Borogroves (Astounding, February 1943).

Nerves by Lester del Rey is a prescient story which tells of an accident at a “National Atomic Products Co. Inc.” plant which, in parts, is eerily similar to some of the real events that occurred at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl (or Fukushima if you are younger). This story is pre-atomic bomb, of course, and the knowledge we now have about nuclear power is considerably different from then—as can be gathered from this early conversation that Doc Ferrel, the folksy head physician of the atomic plant (and narrator), has with one of the other doctors:

“What was it, anyway?”
“Same old story— simple radiation burns. No matter how much we tell the men when they first come in, most of them can’t see why they should wear three ninety-five percent efficient shields when the main converter shield cuts off all but one-tenth percent of the radiation. Somehow, this fellow managed to leave off his two inner shields and pick up a year’s burn in six hours. Now he’s probably back on No. 1 [reactor], still running through the hundred liturgies I gave him to say and hoping we won’t get him sacked.”  p. 55

There’s quite a bit of this ‘slap a bit of salve on your radiation burns and get back to work’ stuff in the story, as well as a fairly cavalier attitude to the catastrophic results of things going wrong, or possibly going wrong:

And besides, once the blow-up happened, with the resultant damage to an unknown area, the pressure groups in Congress would be in, shouting for the final abolition of all atomic work; now they were reasonably quiet, only waiting an opportunity—or, more probably, at the moment were already seizing on the rumors spreading to turn this into their coup. If, by some streak of luck, Palmer could save the plant with no greater loss of life and property than already existed, their words would soon be forgotten, and the benefits from the products of National would again outweigh all risks.  p. 78

But I’m getting ahead of myself. The story begins with Doc Ferrel talking to his junior, Dr Jenkins, about a new process the company is running in reactors 3 and 4 that evening. During this they are informed about an accident—the account of what has happened is rather vague and, when the first casualties come in, they are found to be people that were outside the reactors, injured by exploding debris. Ferrell calls in another doctor.

An exciting second chapter follows, during which Ferrel learns that Palmer, the plant boss, has blocked access to the outside phone lines. More injured men arrive, and they may be contaminated:

Jenkins joined Ferrel on the last patient, replacing Dodd at handing instruments. Doc would have preferred the nurse, who was used to his little signals, but he said nothing, and was surprised to note the efficiency of the boy’s co-operation. “How about the breakdown products?” he asked.
“I-713? Harmless enough, mostly, and what isn’t harmless isn’t concentrated enough to worry about. That is, if it’s still I-713. Otherwise—”
Otherwise, Doc finished mentally, the boy meant there’d be no danger from poisoning, at least. Isotope R, with an uncertain degeneration period, turned into Mahler’s Isotope, with a complete breakdown in a billionth of a second. He had a fleeting vision of men, filled with a fine dispersion of that, suddenly erupting over their body with a violence that could never be described; Jenkins must have been thinking the same thing. For a few seconds, they stood there, looking at each other silently, but neither chose to speak of it.
Ferrel reached for the probe, Jenkins shrugged, and they went on with their work and their thoughts.  p. 62

Jenkins’ wife (a nurse turned newly qualified doctor) makes it into the medical section with reports of the military being mobilised and the city possibly being evacuated. She goes to triage the injured near to the reactor, treating the radiation burn casualties there and sending the shrapnel cases back to Ferrel and his surgical team.
Throughout all this del Rey creates a remarkably convincing and tense narrative, drip feeding bits of his made up nuclear physics in between the medical procedures that are taking place, against a background of an escalating serious accident.
As well as being better informed about nuclear physics than the writer, we also expect our physicians to behave differently nowadays: Ferrel and Blake have a snifter of brandy after several hours of work, and the doctors later resort to shooting up morphine to keep awake! Meanwhile, their ambulance driver gets drunk to cope with the traumatic stress he endures ferrying all those casualties around, and crashes his ambulance.

Matters become even more tense in the next chapter when Palmer (the plant manager) and Ferrel go to one of the atomic converters and organise the men to search through the molten slag for Jorgensen, the only one who understands the process that was running in the plant before the explosion (as well as its risk assessment, the plant may want to review its ‘key man’ and data retention policy).

They find him in an armoured suit in a locker, but he is badly contaminated and stops breathing. Ferrel cracks open Jorgennson’s chest and starts manual heart massage.
Unfortunately, after a cracking start to the story, these events signal a rather padded, potboilerish middle section during which there is much running about and threatening of guards so Ferrel can phone a nearby hospital for an experimental heart and lung machine. There is also a lot of guff about Jenkins thinking he has “cracked” under the strain, Ferrel’s heart to heart with him, and chunks of both men’s backstories.
The last part of the story is a partial return to form: Jorgennson is saved but is of no use to them as his vocal nerves are compromised by widespread radioactive contamination (which, as we have seen previously in this world, affect the nervous system and cause convulsions); Palmer arrives saying the whole place will explode in ten hours and they must evacuate, but Ferrel points to the problem of the contaminated (and also soon to be exploding) men; Hok, the Japanese plant scientist (this in a post-Pearl Harbour America), comes up with a process to transmute the material in their body into something harmless, but it must be done at the plant as it requires I-713. Finally, the underconfident Jenkins comes up with a theoretical solution that will stop the converters exploding, and reveals he is the step-son of a great, and dead, theoretical atomicist.

This has a cracking start but the middle section is padded and the story drags from then on (albeit to a much lesser extent in the final part). This piece should have considerably shortened. That said, you can see why it was so popular at the time.

Pride by Malcolm Jameson is about Tom, a beaten up robot who works in a heavy industry factory:

Everybody, both his fellow workers and the men who operated the great Alberta plant, said Old Tom was slipping—that it was a shame to see a creature let himself go so completely. And it must be admitted that there was something to the gossip. For he never bothered with body oils any more or went to the burnishers. He would go the whole ten-day working period without so much as giving himself a wirebrushing, and on Repair Day he would usually sit quietly on the veranda of the club and take the sun, heedless of the fact that he dripped rust at every move and that wisps of gasket often trailed from the places where his plates were joined.  p. 92

The reason he skips on maintenance is because he is saving all his money and, in the second part of the story, he uses this wealth to have a new robot built. However, Tom will need to donate his own brainbox for use in the new model, which will mean his end. As the story closes Tom refers to this replacement as his son.
This crystallises the story’s problem, which is that Tom behaves like an old man and not a robot. Asimov’s decidedly non-human robots would soon make this type of story seem quite outdated.

Starvation by Fredric Brown (reprinted in his collections as Runaround) isn’t really SF, but is an okay mood piece about the last T. Rex trying to catch something to eat, failing (everything is too fast), and ultimately dying.

With Flaming Swords by Cleve Cartmill is actually my favourite piece in the issue. I know this will cause howls of outrage but I liked it more than the Boucher and del Rey: it is a well done if minor story rather than an uneven but ambitious one.
It starts with this:

You could shock men, I thought, and suffer no consequences. Men were merely slaves. Slaves allowed to serve us, to bring their produce to Eden, to give us their arms and backs and brains.
But these were Saints, here in the big hall. Their massed auras were a blaze of blue against which I narrowed my eyes. We were Saints, with three hundred years of traditional conduct behind us.
And what I had said was not condoned by tradition. I had called them men.
They took it in silence for a few seconds and stared at me, beside the throne of the Patriarch. Then they began to yell, and I felt a sick shame for them. They lost their dignity.
I yelled into their hubbub.
“I invoke the rule of silence!”
The Patriarch raised his glowing arms. Quiet fell. “Against my will,” the Patriarch said, “I command silence. We will hear the rest of Saint Hanson’s heresy.”  p. 109-110

This future world is ruled by the Saints, an oppressive order of men who use humanity as serfs and a source of wives. They are held in religious awe and feared by the rest of humanity, partly because of their blue auras, and partly because they have the power to make men drop dead by the power of their will. As to that latter ability, Hanson knows that what really happens when they raise their hands to the turbans they wear is that they are firing ray guns concealed within. Hanson also knows that a larger version of that ray gun is responsible for the Saints’ altered germ plasm and blue aura:

Here is the truth. Nearly three hundred years ago, a new weapon was introduced into warfare. It was fired only once. The destruction was so great and terrible that nations by common consent outlawed it, for it destroyed friend and foe indiscriminately. Thousands were killed within the radius of its effect. It was silent death, for the gun was a ray gun. But listen. On the edge of that area of destruction, people were affected by that ray. Their germ plasm was affected so that male children born of those individuals were born with an aura.  p. 111

We learn the above later in the story as Hanson is prevented from continuing his speech by another Saint called Wakefield, who suggests that the council shunt the matter into committee because of the febrile atmosphere in the Temple. Hanson feels ostracised and leaves to go home. During the journey he reflects on the advice his human partner Jennings would give him, which is to turn the modulator he has developed on the council (we learn from this passage that, during his research, Hanson has made a device which neutralises the blue aura). We discover more about this world and its history when he arrives home a gives his fiancée, Ellen, a mini-lecture about the situation.
The next part of the plot is not entirely credible: Wakefield visits Hanson, who shows him not only his research but the modulator, and its aura nullifying effect on Hanson’s blood. Needless to say, Wakefield turns the modulator on Hanson, which destroys his aura, and Wakefield then destroys the modulator.
The next day Hanson goes to the council and, as he arrives aura-less, is denounced by Wakefield. Hanson is later excommunicated in a ceremony televised world-wide, and driven from the temple. Outside the common people stone him and he only just escapes.
The rest of the story involves Hanson’s escape to the desert with Jennings and his wife, his involvement with the resistance, and his development of a device that will provide protection against the Saints’ ray guns (and which produces a blue aura around the wearer). They test this on a giant desert terrapin that had previously wandered into their cave:

We placed the box on Methuselah’s broad back. Jennings brought the turban gun.
“Wait!” Magda cried. “Are you certain it’ll work, Bob?”
“No,” I said. “I think maybe, though.”
She got a leaf of lettuce for Methuselah. “Here, fella. If you die, you’ll be happy. He loves it,” she said to me, “if it has a touch of salt.”
Jennings added his farewells. He patted the patterned shell. “So long, mascot.”
I hadn’t seen much of the ugly and somehow awesome creature. I’d been busy. But the Jenningses had made a friend of him.
I touched the button of the little box, and joined in the exclamations. For Methuselah had an aura, bright and blue like a Saint’s.
“There’s a bona fide Patriarch,” Jennings said.  p. 121

After this they plan to confront the Saints at an upcoming ceremony at the Temple, which is going to be televised to the world. The climax at the Temple (spoiler) involves Jennings and Hanson proving immune to Wakefield’s ray gun. Wakefield then dies in a fight with Jennings, and the Patriarch’s aura is neutralised. A hundred men of the resistance arrive and switch on their auras, and the end comes when Magda and the terrapin enter the Temple, also with auras, thus disproving the Saint’s God-given powers. The Patriarch laughs. The conflict is over.

I can understand that the synopsis above is unlikely to convince anyone of the story’s merits and I would not expect it too—the setup and plot are the parts I would label as ‘minor’. What they don’t convey is that I found the strange religious order of supermen intriguing, and that the story is very readable—I was reminded in parts of the slick delivery of Heinlein. The character detail is pretty good for the time as well, particularly the exchanges between Jennings and his wife Magda, and there are a number of observations from Hanson about love and life that ground the story. There are these one-liners, for example, on Hanson’s troubled relationship with his fiancée:

You can take an emotional blow. It won’t kill you. But sometimes you wish it would.
[. . .]
You can be sick with emotion, too. But you don’t die. It just seems that way.  p. 121

And his envy of the Jennings’ relationship:

As this blond giant and his wife bickered in this friendly fashion, I forgot that I was being hunted. Nobody had ever spoken to me like that, and I missed it suddenly. All those years of being set apart rushed over me again. I wanted to be on terms of tender contempt with someone. Perhaps that would be possible with Ellen, now.  p. 118

And, yes, I liked the Terrapin, especially when it glows blue at the end!

I’ve already mentioned Timmins above: this is a Cover of his that puts me neither up nor down. As to the Interior artwork in this issue, my favourites are the Schneeman (for the Jameson) and the Kramer (for the Brown), although I also liked a few of Orban’s for the del Rey.
Weapons and War by John W. Campbell, Jr. is another rambling editorial, this time starting with the topic of shared scientific knowledge and then going on to discuss the problems of scaling up certain industrial processes. I am beginning to get the feeling that when Campbell wrote his editorials he just started typing about whatever was on his mind at the time.

Death Under the Sea by Willy Ley is a science history essay (accompanied by four illustrations/diagrams by the author) which looks at underwater naval warfare, specifically the development and use of mines, torpedoes and submarines through the ages. There is some interesting historical information in this (a lot of the development appears to have taken place during the American Civil War), and I learned where the torpedo got its name from:

The man who coined a name for underwater charges was Robert Fulton. His term was “torpedo” which then did not mean a weapon of naval warfare but simply the electric eel of South American rivers.  p. 45

The Analytical Laboratory: July 1942 puts Simak’s Tools ahead of Will Stewart’s (Jack Williamson) first ‘Seetee’ story Collison Orbit.5
In Times to Come starts by correcting a cover attribution error for the July cover:

A number of kind friends pointed out our slight slip on the crediting of the July cover. Quite right; it was not done by Rogers—but we all make mistakes, and “Cover by Rogers” has been a pretty steady thing for Astounding now. But Rogers is no longer doing covers—he’s in the Canadian army.

It is correctly attributed to Charles de Feo in Brass Tacks.
The rest of the column promises an astronomical cover by von Munchhausen, and stories by Lester del Rey, George O. Smith (the first of the ‘Venus Equilateral’ stories), Murray Leinster, and A.E. van Vogt.

Brass Tacks opens with a letter from Rosella Rands, Washington, D. C., prophesising another war in twenty years, and that they will get all their new ideas for weapons from SF magazines.
Earl C. Smith, Corpus Christi, TX, claims he is a veteran of the SF field, and has a couple of things to get off his chest:

FIRST: Every time an author dreams up a theory on sunspots, cosmic rays, or why, in the final analysis, there is no solidarity—including their theory—does he have to contaminate good reading material by filling page after page with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS? Not that I haven’t an imagination, or that I don’t want an explanation, but, PLEASE, does the author have to convince himself by going to such an extent?
SECOND: Why not give us something different occasionally? The best story I’ve read in any of the current issues was Van Vogt’s “Asylum.” Perhaps I’m contradicting myself on a point here, by liking his story, but I feel the general make-up, the atmosphere, the not bringing out of so many technical details, were points raising his story far above any I’ve read recently.  p. 105

There are also letters from Milton A. Rothman (about a ‘Probability Zero’ story), and Anthony Boucher (about van Vogt’s Secret Unobtainable and the assassination of Reinhart Heydrich). Edward C. Connor, Peoria, IL, didn’t like the van Vogt as because it is set in Germany and concerned the Nazi Party. James Dial, Chicago, IL, ends the comments (on what seems a mixed July issue) with a letter containing this more general observation:

There seems to be one flaw which has grown worse rather than better as time goes on. I speak of the feeble endings of most of your serials and many of your shorts. My idea of a perfect ending is certainly inadequate, but I think that the best I have seen is the one from “Uncertainty.” The suspicion has been growing that perhaps you have been getting work on assignments, and the endings have had to be rushed through. The ending of “Beyond This Horizon” is a case in point. This story has a structure worthy of three serial installments, possibly four, but it ends abruptly, unsatisfyingly, just when the full background has been painted in and the story has attained momentum.  p. 107

This is a pretty good issue, with three good or better novelettes.  ●

_____________________

1. The Great SF Stories #4, edited by Isaac Asimov and Martin H. Greenberg (DAW, 1980) contains:

7 • Introduction (The Great Science Fiction Stories Volume 4, 1942) • (1980) • essay by Martin H. Greenberg
11 • The Star Mouse • [Mitkey • 1] • (1942) • novelette by Fredric Brown
32 • The Wings of Night • (1942) • short story by Lester del Rey
50 • Cooperate – Or Else! • [Rull] • novelette by A. E. van Vogt (variant of Co-Operate – Or Else! 1942)
77 • Foundation • [Foundation (Original Stories) • 1] • (1942) • novelette by Isaac Asimov
110 • The Push of a Finger • (1942) • novella by Alfred Bester
150 • Asylum • (1942) • novella by A. E. van Vogt
205 • Proof • (1942) • short story by Hal Clement
222 • Nerves • (1942) • novella by Lester del Rey
295 • Barrier • (1942) • novella by Anthony Boucher
347 • The Twonky • (1942) • novelette by Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore [as by Lewis Padgett]
369 • QRM – Interplanetary • [Venus Equilateral] • (1942) • novelette by George O. Smith
403 • The Weapon Shop • [Weapon Shops of Isher] • (1942) • novelette by A. E. van Vogt
442 • Mimic • (1942) • short story by Donald A. Wollheim

Apart from the Brown (from Planet Stories) and the Wollheim (from Astonishing Stories), all the rest are Astounding stories.
I’ll review this volume in due course. By the way, there is a groups.io newsgroup that has been set up to discuss these volumes at The-Great-SF-Stories-1939-1963@groups.io. There are only a handful of active commenters, so it won’t wear you out.

2. There isn’t much information about Timmins on the web but there is a page at Pulpartists.com, and links to his covers on his ISFDB page.
Here are two of my favourites taken from Siren in the Night’s Flickr page for Astounding (very slightly touched up to remove the odd crease, scratch, etc., and resized). This is the best of his conventional work:

And this one is the best of his impressionistic covers:

Also worth a look is the Through a Shattered Lens page, especially the last image, which is a striking cover for The Shadow magazine. An occasionally brilliant artist.

3. A radio-phonograph was a wooden box that combined a radio, record player, and speakers. Here is a page of them on Pinterest.

4. The Twonky’s ISFDB page is here. Note its early reprint appearance in Adventures in Time and Space by Raymond J. Healy & J. Francis McComas in 1946.

5. The Analytical Laboratory with the results for this issue appeared in November:

The score of 1.00 for del Rey’s story is extraordinary (and, I originally thought, probably unprecedented and unrepeated, but see Walker’s comment below). Every reader who voted marked it first or joint-first!  ●

This magazine is still being published as Analog Science Fiction and Fact. Subscribe: Kindle UK, Kindle USA or physical & digital copies.

rssrss

6 thoughts on “Astounding Science-Fiction v30n01, September 1942

  1. Walker Martin

    Paul, I see you made the same mistake as John Campbell when you state in footnote 5 that this was the first and perhaps only, example of a story getting a perfect score of 1.00 in the An Lab. In the December 1964 ANALOG I had a letter pointing out to Campbell that 5 stories had received perfect scores: Feb 1941 An Lab for SLAN by van Vogt; Oct 1941 An Lab for Methuselah’s Children by Heinlein; June 1942 An Lab for Beyond This Horizon by MacDonald; November 1942 An Lab for NERVES by del Rey; Dec 1945 An Lab for WORLD OF A by van Vogt.

    Campbell responded “ooops! My five-fold error!”

    Reply
  2. jameswharris

    Since I agree with your assessments of “The Barrier,” “Nerves,” and “The Twonky,” it suggests I should give “With Flaming Swords” a try.

    I can’t believe all the readers voted “Nerves” #1. Both “Nerves” and “The Barrier” could have been greatly improved by some serious cutting and editing. I think I would have rejected “The Twonky” as being too stupid. It would have been a superior story if a time traveler had worked to manipulate the main character’s behavior instead of a walking phonograph.

    I guess Campbell wasn’t always that great of an editor.

    Reply
    1. paul.fraser@sfmagazines.com Post author

      I’d be interested to see what you think of Cartmill’s story, Jim, but suspect there won’t be enough of a central idea for you. Jamie Rubin couldn’t seem to get into it but, reading between the lines of his review (and around it), he may have been a bit burnt out after reading two years plus of old Astoundings.
      Campbell was more of an ideas man as an editor, I think. Story structure and line editing don’t seem to be have been his strengths. When it comes to the padding in the stories it may have been that Campbell was short of material: the magazine went from an 80,000 words pulp to a 110,000 words bedsheet format in January 1942–just as the war started and a number of his writers starting drifting off to the military and the like. I haven’t looked at this part of Fantasy Commentator #59/60 yet so I’ll find out later if this is mentioned.

      Reply
  3. Pingback: Astounding Science-Fiction v21n05, July 1938 | SF MAGAZINES

  4. Pingback: The Great SF Stories Volume 4, 1942 | SF MAGAZINES

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.